Oh no! Where's the JavaScript?
Your Web browser does not have JavaScript enabled or does not support JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript on your Web browser to properly view this Web site, or upgrade to a Web browser that does support JavaScript.
  1. Home
  2. Discussion Forum
  3. AROS FORUMS
  4. Development General
  5. Odyssey Web Browser 64-bit

Odyssey Web Browser 64-bit

Last updated on 2 months ago
Track threadPrint
AMIGASYSTEMAMIGASYSTEMDistro Maintainer
Posted 4 months ago
#161

Amiwell79 wrote:

@Amiwell79 - I need the context menu to copy and paste links. I am currently using 32-bit Aros to meet this need and can wait.

Thank you

You can copy and paste using the following keys:

Copy = Right Win key + C
Paste = Right Win key + V
Signature: AROS One All Thread
AROS One Home Site
AROS One Facebook
A
Amiwell79Distro Maintainer
Posted 4 months ago
#162
do not copy adress link but only text
Edited by Amiwell79 on 15-01-2026 05:35, 4 months ago
AMIGASYSTEMAMIGASYSTEMDistro Maintainer
Posted 4 months ago
#163
As you can see from the attached video, everything you highlight can be copied and pasted.

In the video, there are two examples: one copied from Google and one from a forum.
You do not have access to view attachments
A
Amiwell79Distro Maintainer
Posted 4 months ago
#164
thank you
A
Amiwell79Distro Maintainer
Posted 4 months ago
#165
I used to do F12 C, F12 V. I need to try again.
AMIGASYSTEMAMIGASYSTEMDistro Maintainer
Posted 4 months ago
#166
F12 C and F12 V also work fine. Perhaps it is a problem with your keyboard or operating system. Try AROS One 64Bit and see if it works.
A
Amiwell79Distro Maintainer
Posted 4 months ago
#167
I currently only use OWB on Amiga-based sites and a few others that I can access without any problems, so I don't have the issue of installing 64-bit Aros. I'll let you know. Thanks in the meantime.
N
ntromansSenior Member
Posted 4 months ago
#168

deadwood wrote:

@deadwood - I'm using Odyssey daily for amiga sites and I don't experience that kind of instability. I guess we'll have to go back to this when I back to updating Odyssey (that should come somewhere after 64-bit drivers work is done)


A few days ago it crossed my mind to see if using 'noacpi' would make any difference, and indeed it seems to have done so. I haven't had any crashes on OWB since doing that and indeed my i5 now feels more stable overall. Really should have tried that earlier...

Cheers,
Nigel.
Edited by ntromans on 22-01-2026 18:36, 4 months ago
N
ncafferkeyAROS Dev
Posted 4 months ago
#169
@ntromans It would be interesting to see if the same effect can be achieved by using noioapic instead (noacpi effectively implies noioapic, but turns off other stuff too, assuming my knowledge on that topic isn't outdated).

You could also stress test your networking by doing a ping flood to your router, e.g.:

ping -f 192.168.0.1
D
deadwoodAROS Dev
Posted 4 months ago
#170
@ntromans

Glad your AROS box is now stable. I concur what @ncafferkey said. Try just 'noioapic' and let us know. Smile
N
ntromansSenior Member
Posted 4 months ago
#171

ncafferkey wrote:

@ncafferkey - @ntromans It would be interesting to see if the same effect can be achieved by using noioapic instead (noacpi effectively implies noioapic, but turns off other stuff too, assuming my knowledge on that topic isn't outdated).

You could also stress test your networking by doing a ping flood to your router, e.g.:

ping -f 192.168.0.1


I'll give that a try this evening.

Cheers,
Nigel.
N
ntromansSenior Member
Posted 4 months ago
#172
Just tried the ping with noacpi, noioacpi and neither set. In all cases when I stoped the test the packet loss was 99%. Ouch...

Cheers,
Nigel.
Edited by ntromans on 23-01-2026 16:51, 4 months ago
ncafferkey
N
ncafferkeyAROS Dev
Posted 4 months ago
#173
Thanks for the tests Nigel. What network driver is this?
N
ntromansSenior Member
Posted 4 months ago
#174
It's atheros5000.device.

Cheers,
Nigel.
N
ncafferkeyAROS Dev
Posted 4 months ago
#175
Any better on 32-bit?
N
ntromansSenior Member
Posted 4 months ago
#176

ncafferkey wrote:

@ncafferkey - Any better on 32-bit?


Same for 32 bit - 99% packet loss.

Cheers,
Nigel.
N
ncafferkeyAROS Dev
Posted 4 months ago
#177
There's a possibility your router isn't cooperating with the flood ping. Could you try the same test from another machine with a different network driver that you suspect is more reliable? If the packet loss percentage is still high, you could try targeting another PC with the ping.

BTW, I get around 0% to 5% packet loss for the same test with atheros5000.
N
ntromansSenior Member
Posted 4 months ago
#178
I have a Linux Mint installed on a hard drive that I can put into my 64 bit machine. Using that, I had the same result (99% packet loss). In every case only 11 packets were responded to by the hub.

Then I went back to AROS and did the ping from my 64 bit machine to my 32 bit machine. In this case there was 0% packet loss with round-trip min/avg/max = 0/2/35 ms. There were 62179 packets transmitted, 61923 packets received, +245 duplicates.

Cheers,
Nigel.
ncafferkey
N
ncafferkeyAROS Dev
Posted 4 months ago
#179
Thanks, it looks like pinging between two machines is the only way to do this test then in your environment. Did you have time to try the test between machines with the various boot options? You might need to leave the ping running for a long time (e.g. an hour) to get a good idea of reliability. You could also stress the driver further by adding the option "-s 1024" for bigger packets! Or doing a bidirectional flood ping, where each machine is pinging the other.
N
ntromansSenior Member
Posted 4 months ago
#180
This test is with noioacpi set. I tried the with the addition of -s 1024 and very quickly (within about 11 seconds) got 'no buffer space available' and then lines with 'ret = -1' and the no buffer space error repeated. After stoping the program The final stats were:

9563 packets transmitted, 9267 packets received, +271 duplicates, 3% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 1/14/83 ms

How would you like me to procceed - repeat with noacpi & nothing set or try without the -s 1024 parameter?

Cheers,
Nigel.
You can view all discussion threads in this forum.
You cannot start a new discussion thread in this forum.
You cannot reply in this discussion thread.
You cannot start on a poll in this forum.
You cannot upload attachments in this forum.
You cannot download attachments in this forum.
Moderator: Administrator, Moderators
Users who participated in discussion: amigamia, deadwood, AMIGASYSTEM, pixie, ntromans, retrofaza, Amiwell79, ASiegel, miker1264, mattson1017, jma, ncafferkey, arossystem